How the nursing profession should adapt for a digital future

1. Richard G Booth, associate professor1 ,
2. Gillian Strudwick, scientist2,
3. Susan McBride, professor3,
4. Siobhán O’Connor, lecturer4,
5. Ana Laura Solano López, researcher5

1. ¹Arthur Labatt Family School of Nursing, Western University, London, Canada
2. ²Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Canada
3. ³School of Nursing, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, USA
4. ⁴School of Health in Social Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
5. ⁵University of Costa Rica, San José, Costa Rica

1. Correspondence to: R Booth rbooth6{at}uwo.ca

Transformation into a digitally enabled profession will maximize the benefits to patient care, write Richard Booth and colleagues

Challenges persist

Digital technologies may, however, be viewed as a distraction from, or an unwelcome intrusion into, the hands-on caring role and therapeutic relationships that nurses have with patients and families.7 This purported incompatibility with traditional nursing ideals, such as compassionate care, may explain some nurses’ reluctance to adopt digital approaches to healthcare.89 In addition, nursing’s history was as structurally subordinate to other healthcare disciplines,10 and the profession is still cementing its relationship and leadership in health systems.

The specialty of nursing informatics has long advocated for the integration of technology to support the profession, but it has comparatively few practitioners globally. Nursing informaticians are predominantly based in the United States, where the discipline seems to have originated, but many other countries and regions are expanding their digital nursing workforce and involvement with informatics.1112

Slow progress in some areas has been due to a lack of leadership and investment that supports nurses to champion and lead digital health initiatives. Globally, uncertainty remains regarding the next steps the nursing profession should take to increase and optimize its use of digital technology. This challenge is exacerbated by the global diversity of the profession, including unequal access to resources such as technological infrastructure maturity and expertise. Huge differences exist among countries and regions of the world in terms of the digitalization of healthcare processes, access to internet connectivity, and transparency of health information processes.

Selected technologies: benefits and challenges

The nursing literature contains many analyses of digital technologies used to support or extend the profession, including practice (eg, hospital information systems, electronic health records, monitoring systems, decision support, telehealth); education (eg, e-Learning, virtual reality, serious games); and, rehabilitative and personalized healthcare approaches (eg, assistive devices sensors, ambient assisted living).1 Table 1 summarizes the potential benefits, challenges, and implications of emerging innovations to practice.

The table is not exhaustive, but the diversity of topics researched shows the profession recognizes the value and challenges of digital technologies. Given the evidence, for the profession to make further progress we recommend five areas for focused and immediate action. These recommendations should be qualified in light of regional context and professional background owing to global heterogeneity in nursing and the inclusion of digital technologies into healthcare.

Reform nursing education

We must urgently create educational opportunities at undergraduate and graduate levels in informatics, digital health, co-design, implementation science, and data science.39 These should include opportunities to work with and learn from computing, engineering, and other interdisciplinary colleagues. For instance, nursing will need a critical mass of practitioners who understand how to use data science to inform the creation of nursing knowledge to support practice. 40 These practitioners will also need savviness and courage to lead the development of new models of patient care enabled by digital technologies.4142

Determining how, where, and why technology like AI should be used to support practice is of immediate interest and a growing competency requirement in health sciences and informatics education.43 Nursing education should evolve its competencies and curriculums proactively for the increasing use of digital technologies in all areas of practice39 while incorporating novel pedagogical approaches—for example, immersive technologies such as virtual and augmented reality—to deliver aspects of simulation based education.4445

Recently, the American Association of Colleges of Nursing released core competencies for nursing education, explicitly identifying informatics, social media, and emergent technologies and their impact on decision making and quality as critical to professional practice.46

Build nursing leadership in digital health

All levels of nursing leadership must advocate more actively for, and invest resources in, a profession that is both complemented and extended by digital technology. The profession needs to evolve its use of digital technology by continuing to champion and support nurses to become knowledgeable in, and generate new scientific knowledge on, data analytics, virtual models of care, and the co-design of digital solutions with patients, differences across contexts and regions permitting.

Advancement of leadership competencies in existing informatics technologies, such as clinical decision support systems, electronic health records, and mobile technologies, is also essential: these kinds of systems will undoubtedly come with increasing levels of AI functionality. Possessing a critical mass of nursing leaders who understand the intended and unintended consequences as well as opportunities of these kinds of technologies is vital to ensure the quality and safety of nursing.

The increasing presence and recognition of the importance of chief nursing informatics officers is a step in the right direction.47 Further, providing opportunities for nurses of all specialties to contribute to the development and implementation of digital health policies, locally and nationally, could increase future use of digital technologies in nursing.

Investigate artificial intelligence in nursing practice

The influence of AI on human decision making and labor are areas in need of immediate inquiry to support nursing practice for the next decade and beyond. AI technologies could provide the profession with huge benefits in data analytics and advanced clinical decision support.

Although many of the purported potential benefits of AI (eg, improved patient outcomes, streamlined workflow, improved efficiency) have yet to be fully shown in nursing research,6 it is inevitable that AI technologies will be used more regularly to support and extend nurses’ cognitive, decision making, and potentially labor functions.15

These opportunities bring new and dynamic practice considerations for nursing and interprofessional expertise. One example relates to the potential automation of inequity and injustice within systems and decision support tools containing AI4849: self-evolving algorithms in systems sometimes unintentionally reinforce systemic inequities found in society.

Increased use of AI also brings novel policy, regulatory, legal, and ethical implications to the fore. The nursing profession must examine its role, processes, and knowledge against emerging ethical frameworks that explore the opportunities and risks that AI and similar innovations bring, while advocating for patient involvement in AI development and application. Floridi and colleagues offer tenets regarding AI development and the ethical considerations in using such innovations in their call to develop AI technology that “secures people’s trust, serves the public interest, and strengthens shared social responsibility.” 50 They also advocate that as guiding principles, AI should be used to enhance human agency, increase societal capacities, cultivate societal cohesion, and enable human self-realization, with an emphasis on instilling and reinforcing human dignity.50 Further research, funding, and thought leadership in this domain are needed to help support the development of new practice policy, regulatory frameworks, and ethical guidelines to guide nursing practice.

Re-envision nurse-patient relationships

The profession must reframe how nurses interact with and care for patients in a digital world. The sheer variety of “do-it-yourself” health and wellness applications (eg, personalized genetic testing services, virtual mental health support), mobile and social media applications (eg, mHealth, wearables, online communities of practice) and other virtual healthcare (eg, telemedicine, virtual consultations) options available to consumers is impressive.

All this may seem antithetical toward the traditionally espoused nursing role—therapeutic relationships in physical interactions—but patients are increasingly empowered, connected to the internet, and demanding personalized or self-management healthcare models that fit their busy and varied lifestyles.

To maximize its impact on patient care, the profession should continue to develop virtual care modalities that exploit internet and mobile technology, drawing on its experiences with telehealth and remote models of care.51 These care models might also be extended through virtual or augmented reality technologies or integrated with assisted living or “smart home” systems,52 and potentially other precision and personalized healthcare solutions that leverage genomic and other biometric data.

Care approaches, interpretations of privacy, and technological interoperability functionalities should be co-designed among the interprofessional healthcare team, patients, and carers53 and available where patients want them, ideally in both physical and digital realms. Deeper discussions and scientific research regarding access, cost, electronic resource use or wastage, and equity implications of the increasing digitalization of nurse-patient relationships will also need to be thoroughly explored.

Embrace digital practice

The profession requires a cultural shift. Its membership and leadership must demand the evolution of digital systems better to meet contemporary and emerging needs.

Too often, technology to support nursing is poorly configured, resourced, or not upgraded to respond to practice and societal trends. Nurses still commonly use practice systems that are lacking basic usability (eg, contributing to alert fatigue, reinforcing disruptive workflow processes) or generate added documentation burdens because of poor configuration and optimization.54

There is huge variation globally in access to, integration of, and sustainability of digital technology.555657 Solutions vary and are context specific. Renewed awareness of digital technology’s use brought about by the covid-19 pandemic offers an impetus for change that nurses should embrace.

Tasks undertaken by nurses that do not add enough value to patient care present opportunities for partial or full divestment,58 and may be better integrated into future technology enabled processes or delivered by other care providers.

The profession should revisit cultural interpretations of how technology such as drones, robots, and other AI enabled systems can be considered complementary to nursing practice and process, rather than as competition or adversaries. Collaboration with technology developers, providers, and patients will be essential to ensure success.

Although some outdated nursing activities and processes made redundant or less relevant will likely be missed by some in the profession, digital technology provides opportunities to support new models of care and approaches to nursing practice. We must not allow cultural and historical interpretations of nursing to upend or impede progress.

How nursing can stay relevant

Nurses entering the profession today will undoubtedly witness substantive disruption and change from digital technology by the time they are mid-career.59 Without immediate action, the nursing profession stands to miss a remarkable opportunity to generate new roles, knowledge, and relationships within future health systems and societies saturated by digital technologies.

Nursing will continue to offer value and importance to healthcare systems in the coming decades. However, the profession must consider its role, knowledge, and relationships with technologies and patients to remain relevant in digitally enabled societies and healthcare systems and continue to provide compassionate care in a digital world. Without proactive strategic self-reflection, planning, and action, nursing will fail to control its trajectory across the chasm separating the past, present, and future of practice.

Footnotes

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

References

1. ↵
   1. KrickT,
   2. HuterK,
   3. DomhoffD,
   4. SchmidtA,
   5. RothgangH,
   6. Wolf-OstermannK

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
2. ↵
   1. van BerkelC,
   2. AlmondP,
   3. HughesC,
   4. SmithM,
   5. HorsfieldD,
   6. DuckworthH

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
3. ↵
   1. JibbLA,
   2. StevensBJ,
   3. NathanPC,
   4. et al

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
4. ↵
   1. JibbL,
   2. NathanPC,
   3. BreakeyV,
   4. et al

   OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
5. ↵
   1. ChuangYH,
   2. LaiFC,
   3. ChangCC,
   4. WanHT

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   1. BuchananC,
   2. HowittML,
   3. WilsonR,
   4. et al

   OpenUrlCrossRef
7. ↵
   1. RobichauxC,
   2. TietzeM,
   3. StokesF,
   4. McBrideS

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
8. ↵
   1. SandelowskiM

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
9. ↵
   1. O’Keefe-McCarthyS

   OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
10. ↵
    1. FairmanJ,
    2. D’AntonioP

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
11. ↵
    1. HusseyP,
    2. AdamsE,
    3. ShafferFA

    OpenUrlCrossRef
12. ↵
    1. AtiqueS,
    2. BautistaJR,
    3. BlockLJ,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
13. 1. HorngS,
    2. SontagDA,
    3. HalpernY,
    4. JerniteY,
    5. ShapiroNI,
    6. NathansonLA

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
14. 1. ChenC-M,
    2. JyanH-W,
    3. ChienS-C,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
15. ↵
    1. RobertN

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
16. 1. TopazM,
    2. PruinelliL

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
17. 1. DavenportT,
    2. KalakotaR

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
18. 1. RiekLD

    OpenUrlCrossRef
19. 1. KlemetsJ,
    2. MäättäläJ,
    3. HakalaI

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
20. 1. FritzRL,
    2. DermodyG

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
21. 1. GjestsenMT,
    2. WiigS,
    3. TestadI

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
22. 1. HoelscherD,
    2. McBrideS

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
23. 1. McBrideS,
    2. TietzeM,
    3. HanleyMA,
    4. ThomasL

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
24. 1. BennettP,
    2. HardikerNR

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
25. 1. Akhu-ZaheyaL,
    2. Al-MaaitahR,
    3. Bany HaniS

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
26. 1. YoungHM,
    2. MiyamotoS,
    3. DharmarM,
    4. Tang-FeldmanY

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
27. 1. DodsonCH,
    2. BakerE,
    3. BostK

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
28. 1. O’ConnorS,
    2. ChuCH,
    3. ThiloF,
    4. LeeJJ,
    5. MatherC,
    6. TopazM

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
29. 1. AlexanderGL,
    2. PowellKR,
    3. DerocheCB

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
30. 1. KoivunenM,
    2. SarantoK

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
31. 1. FuMR,
    2. Kurnat-ThomaE,
    3. StarkweatherA,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
32. 1. StarkweatherA,
    2. JacelonCS,
    3. BakkenS,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
33. 1. O’ConnorS,
    2. JolliffeS,
    3. StanmoreE,
    4. RenwickL,
    5. BoothR

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
34. 1. SunY,
    2. ZhangY,
    3. GwizdkaJ,
    4. TraceCB

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
35. 1. WoonAPN,
    2. MokWQ,
    3. ChiengYJS,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
36. 1. EijlersR,
    2. UtensEMWJ,
    3. StaalsLM,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
37. 1. KothgassnerOD,
    2. GoreisA,
    3. KafkaJX,
    4. Van EickelsRL,
    5. PlenerPL,
    6. FelnhoferA

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
38. 1. TyrrellR,
    2. Sarig-BahatH,
    3. WilliamsK,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRef
39. ↵
    1. BuchananC,
    2. HowittML,
    3. WilsonR,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRef
40. ↵
    1. BrennanPF,
    2. BakkenS

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
41. ↵
    1. PepitoJA,
    2. LocsinR

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
42. ↵
    1. McBrideSG,
    2. TietzeM,
    3. FentonMV

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
43. ↵
    1. SapciAH,
    2. SapciHA

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
44. ↵
    1. O’ConnorS

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
45. ↵
    1. ChenFQ,
    2. LengYF,
    3. GeJF,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
46. ↵
    The American Association of Colleges of Nursing. The essentials: Core competencies for professional nursing education. 2021. https://www.aacnnursing.org/Education-Resources/AACN-Essentials
47. ↵
    1. KirbySB

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
48. ↵
    1. GianfrancescoMA,
    2. TamangS,
    3. YazdanyJ,
    4. SchmajukG

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
49. ↵
    1. ObermeyerZ,
    2. PowersB,
    3. VogeliC,
    4. MullainathanS

    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
50. ↵
    1. FloridiL,
    2. CowlsJ,
    3. BeltramettiM,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
51. ↵
    1. ChoiYK,
    2. LazarA,
    3. DemirisG,
    4. ThompsonHJ

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
52. ↵
    1. SpiegelB,
    2. FullerG,
    3. LopezM,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
53. ↵
    1. deBronkartD,
    2. EysenbachG

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
54. ↵
    1. YanQ,
    2. JiangZ,
    3. HarbinZ,
    4. TolbertPH,
    5. DaviesMG

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
55. ↵
    1. KonttilaJ,
    2. SiiraH,
    3. KyngäsH,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
56. ↵
    1. BrownJ,
    2. PopeN,
    3. BoscoAM,
    4. MasonJ,
    5. MorganA

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
57. ↵
    1. KoM,
    2. WagnerL,
    3. SpetzJ

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
58. ↵
    1. HusseyP,
    2. KennedyM

    1. BoothR,
    2. StrudwickG,
    3. McMurrayJ,
    4. et al

    OpenUrlCrossRef
59. ↵
    1. CoieraE

    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed